Stefano Guerrera

So pick me. Choose me. Love me.

auntytany:

lostbeasts:

i will forever be dumbfounded by the SHEER SIZES of some prehistoric animals i mean

image

holy

image

friggin

image

shit

image

i still think HORSES are big but

image

would you

image

just

image

cOULD YOU IMAGINE

image

FUCK

image

(via skydelasowl)

kanasayu:

image

look at this calming lil kitty. feel better friend!! <333

(via flyingtit)

thepinkgiftbag asked: Are there poc from history that weren't slaves or servents? ( I'm sure there were, but were there any well known ones?)

medievalpoc:

I get why you asked this question, and I get why you framed it the way you have. But I want to take this moment to break down what you’re really asking, here. Let’s take your question on a world tour.

Education in the U.S. (and some other places, too), is incredibly Eurocentric, and most people don’t even know the histories of places other than Europe pre-1500s, and America post-1500s.

This leads to the following assumptions that 1. all history occurred in Europe; 2. Europe was always dominant as a “continent” over all other continents; 3. That people we consider white are a world majority.

Here’s a breakdown of the would population by continent. We know that they are far from racially homogenous, but a re-framing is definitely in order.

image

Just about 75% of the world’s population lives in Africa and Asia. Notice that’s 60.3% in Asia alone.

As for relative SIZE of continents, a lot of people have really confused ideas about relative sized of continents in relation to each other. A graphic designed by Kai Krause went viral in some parts of the internet a while back, but in case you missed it, here it is:

image

Here’s the whole thing, which has the original data input the graphic was made from, as well as this image of Europe superimposed on Africa, true to proportion:

image

and this:

image

The Peters World Map, introduced in the 70s, generated a lot of controversy because it shows the continents in true area and proportion. It can look oddly “squished” to many people used to a different map:

image

[bigger]

Okay, we’ve discussed the size and proportion of land masses that humans occupy, and relative populousness of those land masses. But what about race? Well, in a lot of ways, the way we construct race is by skin color; dark or light. Here’s a (admittedly super generalizing) map of the world’s human population by approximate skin color. But it helps some people to see it [via Encyclopedia Brittanica]:

image

Now, the “lightest skin” areas don’t necessarily reflect “white people” as we would think of it. Many East Asians and Indigenous people in the north (Inuit, Saami), have light skin.

There is no way to make an accurate estimate of what percentage of the world’s population now are what race because many, many nations do not take a census that records race. Trying to determine racial demographics from past eras, especially in Medieval or Ancient times when concepts like “white people” did. not. exist. is basically impossible, for all intents and purposes. Some people say that a third of the entire world’s population lived in Europe during say, the Middle Ages…as we can see that doesn’t necessarily mean “white people”. Moreover, what are we basing that on? Do they take Chinese documents into account? What about the documents from the library of Timbuktu, which as far as I know are still being explored, cataloged, and translated?

Let’s revisit the question. "Are there poc from history that weren’t slaves or serv[a]nts?"

Now, let’s flip the question: For the entirety of human history, was the majority of the world’s population subject to a minority of the world’s population?

The answer is, of course, no. The expectation that there would be a finite list of exceptions to enslavement and servitude on the part of ALL people of color for the ENTIRETY of human history is based on our current views of the world, based on what we have been taught, and HOW we have been taught it.

These expectations are shaped by the media we consume and create.

image

image

image

image

image

These expectations are created by an education curricula for history that begins in Europe, a Europe that is supposedly isolated geographically and culturally, despite the fact that it isn’t even separated by water from Asia.

American history begins with “first contact” or “discovery”, with almost no mention of the political or social history of the continent before being “discovered”. The terminology used in most books and documentaries is definitively Eurocentric: “We” discovered “The Other”. We divide time and space into “The Old World” and “The New World.” WHO, exactly, was this “world” NEW to?

What I would *love* to see is an analysis of how many classes that use books that DO cover non-European history, SKIP those histories because “there’s no time”. I am in a rather unique position to witness this, and have come to believe that this is a very common practice in American/U.S. classrooms. Because learning the same five things about the Revolutionary War and World War 2 for six years in a row takes precedence over learning even the most basic facts about anything regarding World History. WHY do we learn the same things over and over? WHY do we know what we know? WHO wrote it down and said this is not just truth, but The Truth?

I’m not asking these questions because I know the answers…I don’t, really. I’m asking them because I want this questioning habit to spread as far as it can. This blog covers only the teeniest, tiniest portion of human history! The focus is incredibly narrow, because I am only one person. But look how much can be amassed in terms of knowledge, in terms of forming new questions, just by ONE person! A whole generation of people are becoming adults right now, and they should be full of questions. Who is going to write the history for the generation after this one? Can you do better?

Can we do better?

I believe with all my heart that we can.

Stavamo meglio quando sull’Alcatel passavamo le giornate intere per leggere un SMS. Sul quel display retroilluminato arancione ad una linea le lettere scorrevano da destra verso sinistra, lentamente, accompagnate da un sacco di mistero e suspense; poi ovviamente alla fine di ogni messaggio avevamo almeno qualche anno in più.

Stavamo meglio quando gli squilli significavano tutto, quando uno squillo poteva esprimere almeno tre cose diverse: ti penso, mi manchi e scendi sono sotto casa. Dovevi impegnarti un sacco per capire il vero senso intrinseco di quello specifico segnale acustico in quel dato preciso momento ma chissà perché poi, nessuno sbagliava mai. 

Stavamo meglio quando le suonerie te le facevi da solo col compositore. Quando la suoneria era cosa tua e solo tua. Stavamo meglio quando la più alta forma di impegno sociale era “lo squillo a tutta la rubrica prima di andare a dormire” per poi svegliarsi e ritrovare il registro chiamate intasato. Quante amicizie sono finite per i mancati squilli di risposta, ah quante…

Stavamo meglio quando le chiamate anonime erano dichiarazioni d’amore misteriose da ammiratori segreti poco impavidi e poco temerari (o semplicemente con troppi brufoli) che preferivano rimanere senza nome mentre tu eri lì a giocare ad Indovina Chi? sperando che qualcuno di vicino a te facesse un passo falso per permetterti di scoprire Mister X. Poi è arrivata lei, Megan Gale, colei che ha decretato l’inizio della fine. Le offerte telefoniche piovevano da ogni dove chiunque ti regalava messaggi, chiunque ti dava minuti di chiamate gratis, tutti si sentivano in dovere di utilizzare tutto quello che avevano pagato.
Potevi sentire tutti ed in qualsiasi momento; il messaggio di buongiorno e di buonanotte hanno preso il sopravvento sullo squillo, i messaggi multipli erano sempre più impersonali ma almeno c’era ancora il beneficio del dubbio: “chissà se l’ha letto”, “chissà se l’ha ricevuto”, “chissà se è ancora vivo”. Ora no, non c’è più nulla di simile. 

Ora ricevere una chiamata anonima è sinonimo di infermità mentale, ricevere una chiamata con i sospiri è sicuramente frutto di un pervertito, gli squilli e i messaggi sono morti e al loro posto ci sono le spunte di WhatsApp che insieme all’angosciante “Ultimo accesso” non permettono di dire bugie. Prima più il cellulare ce l’avevi piccolo più era fico, ora più ce l’hai grande più detti tendenza (anche per i cellulari è valida la proporzione pene/SUV) erano tutti colorati e divertenti, ora siamo tutti standardizzati e se squilla un telefono ci giriamo tutti perché pensiamo immediatamente sia il nostro.

Ho come l’impressione che la tecnologia ci permetta di sentirci più vicini ma che questo avvicinamento sia solo fittizio.Tutto è diventato più immediato, tutto è più veloce ma tutto è diventato anche inesorabilmente freddo, piatto e scialbo. È come se prima riuscissi a sentire più la mancanza delle persone, ora siamo tutti così raggiungibili ed esposti da essere poco interessanti. 

Ci stiamo allontanando avvicinandoci. 



http://www.famoweb.it/polemica-04/